Am 12.09.2013 03:23, schrieb Fam Zheng:
> On Wed, 09/11 17:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Delete an unnecessary dependency for cocoa.o; we already have
>> a general rule that tells Make that we can build a .o file
>> from a .m source using an ObjC compiler, so this specific
>> rule is unnecessary. Fur
On 12 September 2013 15:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
> I don't think I have any other Cocoa patches queued - or did I miss a
> more acceptable version of the command-key workaround?
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-08/msg02300.html
is the latest on that front: it is no longer try
On Wed, 09/11 17:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Delete an unnecessary dependency for cocoa.o; we already have
> a general rule that tells Make that we can build a .o file
> from a .m source using an ObjC compiler, so this specific
> rule is unnecessary. Further, it is using the dubious construct
> "$(S
Delete an unnecessary dependency for cocoa.o; we already have
a general rule that tells Make that we can build a .o file
from a .m source using an ObjC compiler, so this specific
rule is unnecessary. Further, it is using the dubious construct
"$(SRC_PATH)/$(obj)" to get at the source directory, whi
