On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
[...]
>> Unless I missed something you didn't commit Glauber's patch.
>
> What's c169998802505c244b8bcad562633f29de7d74a4 then?
My bad, I updated and didn't notice you had applied further
modifications. I seriously lack the commit mail notificati
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Laurent Desnogues
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> [...]
>> Thanks, applied. While testing I noticed that the poor x86 emulator
>> does not survive even five system_resets until BIOS refuses to boot.
>> This happens without your patch. I
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
[...]
> Thanks, applied. While testing I noticed that the poor x86 emulator
> does not survive even five system_resets until BIOS refuses to boot.
> This happens without your patch. In comparison, I see no problems
> resetting Sparc32, Sparc64 or P
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:01:45PM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Laurent Desnogues
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 08:05:40PM +0200, Blue Swirl
