On 3/21/2011 2:34 PM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote:
> On 3/21/2011 2:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Harsh Prateek Bora
>> wrote:
>>> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
>>> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in vi
On 3/21/2011 2:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Harsh Prateek Bora
> wrote:
>> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
>> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 RFC.
>> Appropriate changes are required
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Harsh Prateek Bora
wrote:
> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 RFC.
> Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk.
>
> Signed-off-by:
The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM
which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 RFC.
Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk.
Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora
---
hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c |5 -
hw/9pfs/vi