On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 01:33:27PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> Good to know that we have a solution. :)
>
> I think this is a good fix, however I still do not understand why this
> is happening... Please see below comment.
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:11:48PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > d1f6af6
Good to know that we have a solution. :)
I think this is a good fix, however I still do not understand why this
is happening... Please see below comment.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:11:48PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> d1f6af6 "kvm-irqchip: simplify kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route" was a cleanup
> of kv
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:11:48 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> d1f6af6 "kvm-irqchip: simplify kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route" was a cleanup
> of kvmchip routing configuration, that was mostly intended for x86.
> However, it also contains a subtle change in behaviour which breaks EEH[1]
> error recovery on c
d1f6af6 "kvm-irqchip: simplify kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route" was a cleanup
of kvmchip routing configuration, that was mostly intended for x86.
However, it also contains a subtle change in behaviour which breaks EEH[1]
error recovery on certain VFIO passthrough devices on spapr guests. So far
it's onl
