Am 02.06.2010 12:06, schrieb Corentin Chary:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hur
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
>>> This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
>>> in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
>>> functions like vnc
On 05/04/2010 03:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions like vnc_convert_pixe
Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
>> This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
>> in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
>> functions like vnc_convert_pixel are not static anymore, but
>> should not b
On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions like vnc_convert_pixel are not static anymore, but
should not be a problem with gcc 4.5 and the new -flto.
Signed-off-by
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions like vnc_convert_pixel are not static anymore, but
should not be a problem with gcc 4.5 and the new -flto.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary
---
Makefile |
