On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions
Am 02.06.2010 12:06, schrieb Corentin Chary:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may
On 05/04/2010 03:12 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:15, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions like
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions like vnc_convert_pixel are not static anymore, but
should not be a problem with gcc 4.5 and the new -flto.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary corenti...@iksaif.net
---
On 05/03/2010 07:31 AM, Corentin Chary wrote:
This will allow to implement new encodings (tight, zrle, ..)
in a cleaner way. This may hurt performances, because some
functions like vnc_convert_pixel are not static anymore, but
should not be a problem with gcc 4.5 and the new -flto.