Am 11.05.2013 11:01, schrieb Igor Mitsyanko:
> On 11.05.2013 10:41, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Am 10.05.2013 22:14, schrieb Igor Mitsyanko:
>>> On 29.03.2013 21:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
The cross i586-mingw32msvc-gcc 4.4.4 from Debian Squeeze does not
support
__sync_val_compare_and_swap by
On 11.05.2013 10:41, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 10.05.2013 22:14, schrieb Igor Mitsyanko:
On 29.03.2013 21:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
The cross i586-mingw32msvc-gcc 4.4.4 from Debian Squeeze does not
support
__sync_val_compare_and_swap by default.
Using -march=i686 fixes that and should also result in
Am 10.05.2013 22:14, schrieb Igor Mitsyanko:
> On 29.03.2013 21:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> The cross i586-mingw32msvc-gcc 4.4.4 from Debian Squeeze does not
>> support
>> __sync_val_compare_and_swap by default.
>>
>> Using -march=i686 fixes that and should also result in better code.
>>
>> Signed-of
On 29.03.2013 21:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
The cross i586-mingw32msvc-gcc 4.4.4 from Debian Squeeze does not support
__sync_val_compare_and_swap by default.
Using -march=i686 fixes that and should also result in better code.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
---
Maybe this modification is also needed f
Thanks, applied.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> The cross i586-mingw32msvc-gcc 4.4.4 from Debian Squeeze does not support
> __sync_val_compare_and_swap by default.
>
> Using -march=i686 fixes that and should also result in better code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
> ---
On 30 March 2013 13:44, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 29 March 2013 17:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> Maybe this modification is also needed for native gcc-4.4 and older
>>> on Linux i386. If yes, we can move the new script code out of the
>>> Min
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 29 March 2013 17:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> Maybe this modification is also needed for native gcc-4.4 and older
>> on Linux i386. If yes, we can move the new script code out of the
>> MinGW conditional code.
>
> There are at least a few pe
On 29 March 2013 17:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Maybe this modification is also needed for native gcc-4.4 and older
> on Linux i386. If yes, we can move the new script code out of the
> MinGW conditional code.
There are at least a few people who want to run on older
CPUs still (though the use of rdt
The cross i586-mingw32msvc-gcc 4.4.4 from Debian Squeeze does not support
__sync_val_compare_and_swap by default.
Using -march=i686 fixes that and should also result in better code.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil
---
Maybe this modification is also needed for native gcc-4.4 and older
on Linux i386.