On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko
> wrote:
>> From: Igor V. Kovalenko
>>
>> This is a workaround only, and is a partial revert
>> of a few changes to BMDMAState which removed pci_dev
>> field on the way.
>>
>> - cmd646 pci_fr
From: Igor V. Kovalenko
This is a workaround only, and is a partial revert
of a few changes to BMDMAState which removed pci_dev
field on the way.
- cmd646 pci_from_bm() expects bm->unit value to
correspond with bm data being passed to callback
as opaque pointer. This breaks when write to dma
con
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko
wrote:
> From: Igor V. Kovalenko
>
> This is a workaround only, and is a partial revert
> of a few changes to BMDMAState which removed pci_dev
> field on the way.
>
> - cmd646 pci_from_bm() expects bm->unit value to
> correspond with bm data bei
From: Igor V. Kovalenko
This is a workaround only, and is a partial revert
of a few changes to BMDMAState which removed pci_dev
field on the way.
- cmd646 pci_from_bm() expects bm->unit value to
correspond with bm data being passed to callback
as opaque pointer. This breaks when write to dma
con
