Marc-André can you queue this patch in your gnew series?
On 09/12/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Prefer g_new() / g_new0() to be farther backwards compatible with older
glib versions. As there's no point in zeroing the allocation here (the
loop right afterwards fully initializes the memory),
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:24:21AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Prefer g_new() / g_new0() to be farther backwards compatible with older
> glib versions. As there's no point in zeroing the allocation here (the
> loop right afterwards fully initializes the memory), use the former.
>
> Signed-off-by:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 12 September 2017 07:24
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: Paul Durrant ; Stefano Stabellini
> ; xen-devel
> Subject: [PATCH]
Prefer g_new() / g_new0() to be farther backwards compatible with older
glib versions. As there's no point in zeroing the allocation here (the
loop right afterwards fully initializes the memory), use the former.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/hw/block/xen_disk.c
+++