Alexander Graf writes:
> On 15.10.2013, at 01:58, Aneesh Kumar K.V
> wrote:
>
>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>>
>> Correctly update the htab_mask using the return value of
>> KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB ioctl. Also we don't update sdr1
>> on GET_SREGS for HV. So don't update htab_mask if sdr1
>> is fo
On 15.10.2013, at 01:58, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
>
> Correctly update the htab_mask using the return value of
> KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB ioctl. Also we don't update sdr1
> on GET_SREGS for HV. So don't update htab_mask if sdr1
> is found to be zero. Fix the pte index c
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
Correctly update the htab_mask using the return value of
KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB ioctl. Also we don't update sdr1
on GET_SREGS for HV. So don't update htab_mask if sdr1
is found to be zero. Fix the pte index calculation to be
same as that found in the kernel
Signed-off-by:
