Hi Luiz,
I have these patches applied to qga branch with Eric's suggested fix-ups
included. I've attached them for your review. If all looks good I'll send a
PULL some time today with what's hopefully all the pending fixes for qemu-ga 1.1
On Mon, 14 May 2012 09:56:30 -0500
Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Luiz,
I have these patches applied to qga branch with Eric's suggested fix-ups
included. I've attached them for your review. If all looks good I'll send a
PULL some time today with what's hopefully all the
On 11.05.2012 21:19, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
The main motivation for this series is fixing two possible race conditions
in the guest-suspend-* API due to the complexity that arose from the way
we handle terminated children processes today. Full details in the first
patch.
This series applies
On Mon, 14 May 2012 19:06:28 +0200
Michal Privoznik mpriv...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11.05.2012 21:19, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
The main motivation for this series is fixing two possible race conditions
in the guest-suspend-* API due to the complexity that arose from the way
we handle
On 05/14/2012 11:06 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 11.05.2012 21:19, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
The main motivation for this series is fixing two possible race conditions
in the guest-suspend-* API due to the complexity that arose from the way
we handle terminated children processes today. Full
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:39:50PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 09:56:30 -0500
Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Luiz,
I have these patches applied to qga branch with Eric's suggested fix-ups
included. I've attached them for your review. If all
On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:19:04 -0500
Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 01:39:50PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 09:56:30 -0500
Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Luiz,
I have these patches applied to qga branch
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:17:18AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/14/2012 11:06 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 11.05.2012 21:19, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
The main motivation for this series is fixing two possible race conditions
in the guest-suspend-* API due to the complexity that arose from
On Mon, 14 May 2012 13:12:35 -0500
Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Additionally, *all* commands carry the risk that qemu-ga can die
(killed, crashed, guest reboots, not being installed to begin with, etc)
before
issuing a response, so a timeout mechanism *must* be in place if
The main motivation for this series is fixing two possible race conditions
in the guest-suspend-* API due to the complexity that arose from the way
we handle terminated children processes today. Full details in the first
patch.
This series applies on top of my two other qemu-ga series submitted
10 matches
Mail list logo
