Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] iothread improvements for Mac OS X

2011-07-23 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 06/09/2011 06:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: These are two old patches that I never submitted because I didn't really think they were useful except as cleanups. Recently, however, Alex Graf mentioned some problems that Mac OS X has with iothread, and they sounded to me like they were related to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] iothread improvements for Mac OS X

2011-06-28 Thread Alexandre Raymond
Hi Paolo, > Ping? 1/2 is probably somehow working around the sigmask problem fixed by > Alexandre (Mac people, can you check?), but it is way more readable than the > fair_mutex IMNSHO.  I would be surprised if 2/2 also turned out to be a > workaround, but even if this were the case, it makes CPU

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] iothread improvements for Mac OS X

2011-06-27 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 06/09/2011 01:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: These are two old patches that I never submitted because I didn't really think they were useful except as cleanups. Recently, however, Alex Graf mentioned some problems that Mac OS X has with iothread, and they sounded to me like they were related to

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] iothread improvements for Mac OS X

2011-06-09 Thread Paolo Bonzini
These are two old patches that I never submitted because I didn't really think they were useful except as cleanups. Recently, however, Alex Graf mentioned some problems that Mac OS X has with iothread, and they sounded to me like they were related to these patches. And quite surprisingly, both of