Thanks Peter for all the feedback! I have just sent the v2 (have been
on holiday this weekend, a bit offline). I hope that this one is a
better patch.
Sorry Riku, I have doubleposted the new patch to you, I slipped on the
git send-email command, and sent the patch only to you at first (not
to the
On 8 October 2012 19:42, Alex Barcelo abarc...@ac.upc.edu wrote:
okay, now I see that this lacks a lot of presentation.
Before sending a v2, is there something more that I should correct?
Well, yes, your cover letter could be a little more verbose, but I
think mostly it's just that nobody's
okay, now I see that this lacks a lot of presentation.
This is a patch to fix a problem on signal masks, and solves a certain
problem when the client is playing the game of sigsegv mask/unmask.
I will explain it a little more on a better patch. This should have
been explained on the 00/00 cover.
The first patch creates a sigprocmask wrapper on signal.c for its use in
syscall.c
The second patch changes the wrapper to protect sigsegv bit on the signal mask.
Alex Barcelo (2):
signal: added a wrapper for sigprocmask function
signal: sigsegv protection on do_sigprocmask
