Eduardo Habkost writes:
> A few fixes on check-qom-proplist that will ensure we test both
> class properties and object properties, and catch errors when
> registering properties in test code.
Series
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster
Excessively long delay considering how simple these patches are
Pinging again.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:02:37PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Ping?
>
> Markus, do you want to merge this through your tree?
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:37:45AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > A few fixes on check-qom-proplist that will ensure we test both
> > class prop
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:07:30AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 17.10.2016 um 23:02 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > Ping?
> >
> > Markus, do you want to merge this through your tree?
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:37:45AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> A few fixes on check-qom-proplist
Am 17.10.2016 um 23:02 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> Ping?
>
> Markus, do you want to merge this through your tree?
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:37:45AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> A few fixes on check-qom-proplist that will ensure we test both
>> class properties and object properties, and c
Ping?
Markus, do you want to merge this through your tree?
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:37:45AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> A few fixes on check-qom-proplist that will ensure we test both
> class properties and object properties, and catch errors when
> registering properties in test code.
>
>
A few fixes on check-qom-proplist that will ensure we test both
class properties and object properties, and catch errors when
registering properties in test code.
Eduardo Habkost (2):
tests: check-qom-proplist: Remove "bv" class property from class
tests: check-qom-proplist: Use &error_abort t