At 03/20/2012 11:45 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:59:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
>>> At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
But we do not have such f
On (Mon) 02 Apr 2012 [18:05:45], Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> > At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> >> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
> >> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
> >>
> >> Another purpose of this feature
At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
>> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
>> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>>
>> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
>> libvirt) can do auto dump whe
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:44:45PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/22/2012 03:31 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:05:12AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/22/2012 03:19 AM, Anthony Liguori Wrote:
> >>> On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 06:1
At 03/22/2012 03:31 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:05:12AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/22/2012 03:19 AM, Anthony Liguori Wrote:
>>> On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
>> Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_m
At 03/22/2012 03:12 AM, Anthony Liguori Wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 06:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/15/2012 01:25 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
There was such vm exit (KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL), but it was deemed to be a
bad idea.
>>>
>>> BTW, this would help a lot in emulating hypercalls of othe
At 03/22/2012 03:28 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:19:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
> event
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:04:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 05:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Do you have any ot
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:05:12AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/22/2012 03:19 AM, Anthony Liguori Wrote:
> > On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >>>
> Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
> e
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:19:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >>
> >>>Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
> >>>event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course i
At 03/22/2012 03:19 AM, Anthony Liguori Wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>>>
Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
>>>
Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
implement something more complex than simple hypercall for panic
notification we better do something more interesting with it than just
saying "panic hap
On 03/21/2012 11:25 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
implement something more complex than simple hypercall for panic
On 03/15/2012 06:46 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2012 01:25 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
There was such vm exit (KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL), but it was deemed to be a
bad idea.
BTW, this would help a lot in emulating hypercalls of other hypervisors
(or of KVM's VAPIC in the absence of in-kernel irqchip
On 03/13/2012 05:47 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
Do you have any other comments about this patch?
Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the pat
On 2012-03-21 18:34, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 07:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
>>> In fact the feature can be implemented 100% host side by searching for a
>>> panic string signature in the console logs.
>>
>> You can even go one better and search for the panic string in the
>> gues
On 03/21/2012 07:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > In fact the feature can be implemented 100% host side by searching for a
> > panic string signature in the console logs.
>
> You can even go one better and search for the panic string in the
> guest memory directly, which is what virt-dmesg
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:25:16PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> >
> >> Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
> >> event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
> >> implement something more compl
On 03/21/2012 06:18 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
>> Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
>> event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
>> implement something more complex than simple hypercall for panic
>> notification we better do someth
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:18:16AM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
>
> >Look at drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c. It has code to send panic
> >event over IMPI. The code is pretty complex. Of course if we a going to
> >implement something more complex than simple hypercall for panic
> >notification
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:35:49PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/21/2012 05:11 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:56:03AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/20/2012 11:45 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:59:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> A
At 03/21/2012 05:11 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:56:03AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/20/2012 11:45 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:59:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 08:56:03AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/20/2012 11:45 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:59:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> >>> At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> We can know the gue
At 03/20/2012 11:45 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:59:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
>>> At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
But we do not have such f
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:59:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> > At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> >> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
> >> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
> >>
> >> Another purpose of thi
At 03/19/2012 03:33 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
>> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
>> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>>
>> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
>> libvirt) can do auto dump whe
At 03/08/2012 03:57 PM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>
> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
> libvirt) can do auto dump when the guest is crashed. If management
> app does n
At 03/15/2012 07:46 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 01:25 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> There was such vm exit (KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL), but it was deemed to be a
>>> bad idea.
>>
>> BTW, this would help a lot in emulating hypercalls of other hypervisors
>> (or of KVM's VAPIC in the absence of i
On 03/15/2012 01:25 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> > There was such vm exit (KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL), but it was deemed to be a
> > bad idea.
>
> BTW, this would help a lot in emulating hypercalls of other hypervisors
> (or of KVM's VAPIC in the absence of in-kernel irqchip - I had to jump
> through hoop
On 2012-03-15 11:39, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:46:08AM -0700, Eric Northup wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:46:08AM -0700, Eric Northup wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wro
At 03/15/2012 02:46 AM, Eric Northup Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/14/2012
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> > > On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > >
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > > On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > > > > >
> >
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think we want to use the driver. Instead, have a
On 03/14/2012 03:14 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't think we want to use the driver. Instead, have a small piece of
> > > > code that resets the device and pushes out a st
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think we want to use the driver. Instead, have a small piece of
> > > code that resets the device and pushes out a string (the panic message?)
> > > without any interrupts
On 03/14/2012 03:07 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think we want to use the driver. Instead, have a small piece of
> > > code that resets the device and pushes out a string (the panic message?)
> > > without any interrupts etc.
> > >
> > >
On 03/14/2012 01:11 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> > I don't think we want to use the driver. Instead, have a small piece of
> > code that resets the device and pushes out a string (the panic message?)
> > without any interrupts etc.
> >
> > It's still going to be less reliable than a hypercall,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:06:50PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:59 PM, Daniel P. Berrange Wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> >> If so
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:06:50PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:59 PM, Daniel P. Berrange Wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> >> If so
At 03/14/2012 06:58 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:57:59PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:52:07PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 03/14/2012 06:37 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:5
At 03/14/2012 06:48 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 12:46 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 12:26 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
>> visible to guest
At 03/14/2012 06:59 PM, Daniel P. Berrange Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>
>> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
>> vi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >>>
> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> visible to guest
> userspace, the program running
At 03/14/2012 06:57 PM, Daniel P. Berrange Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:21:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >>>
> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> visible to guest
> userspace, the program running
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:57:59PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:52:07PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/14/2012 06:37 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> >>> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:53:00], Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012
On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [18:52:07], Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:37 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> > On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:53:00], Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:21:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
> > At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > > On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >>> On 03/12
At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>
If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
visible to guest
userspace, the program running in userspace may write the same message to
the channel.
>>>
>>> Acce
At 03/14/2012 06:52 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:52:07PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/14/2012 06:37 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
>>> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:53:00], Wen Congyang wrote:
At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang
On 03/14/2012 12:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> >> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> >> visible to guest
> >> userspace, the program running in userspace may write the same message to
> >> the channel.
> >
> > Access control is via permissions. You can ha
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:52:07PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 06:37 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> > On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:53:00], Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivit
At 03/14/2012 06:37 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:53:00], Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
On 03/14/2012 12:46 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 12:26 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > > >> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> > > >> visible to guest
> > > >> userspace, the program running
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:29:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 12:26 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > >> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> > >> visible to guest
> > >> userspace, the program running in userspace may write the same message
> > >> to the
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:10:04PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [18:04:40], Wen Congyang wrote:
> > At 03/14/2012 05:51 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> > > On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
> > >> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > >>> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM,
On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [18:04:40], Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 05:51 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> > On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +
On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [17:53:00], Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Av
On 03/14/2012 12:26 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> If so, is this channel visible to guest userspace? If the channle is
> >> visible to guest
> >> userspace, the program running in userspace may write the same message to
> >> the channel.
> >>
> >
> > Surely there's some kind of access control on
At 03/14/2012 06:07 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 11:53 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Mon,
On 03/14/2012 12:04 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> > This is sufficient. On the host, you can open /tmp/foo using a custom
> > program or nc (nc -U /tmp/foo). On the guest, you can just open
> > /dev/virtio-ports/port1 and read/write into it.
>
> I have two questions:
> 1. does it OK to open this
On 03/14/2012 11:53 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> >>> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity
At 03/14/2012 05:24 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
>>> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrot
At 03/14/2012 05:51 PM, Amit Shah Wrote:
> On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
>>> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congy
On (Wed) 14 Mar 2012 [16:29:50], Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Do you have any other comm
On 03/14/2012 10:29 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Do you have any other comments abou
At 03/13/2012 06:47 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
Do you have any other comments about this patch?
>>>
>>> Not really, but I'm not 100
On 03/13/2012 11:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > > Do you have any other comments about this patch?
> > >
> >
> > Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:33PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > Do you have any other comments about this patch?
> >
>
> Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
> likely to only be used by Linux, which has kexec facilities
On 03/13/2012 08:44 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 03/12/2012 06:33 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> > On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> Do you have any other comments about this patch?
> >>
> >
> > Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
> > likely to only be use
At 03/12/2012 06:33 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> Do you have any other comments about this patch?
>>
>
> Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
> likely to only be used by Linux, which has kexec facilities, and you can
> put
On 03/12/2012 11:04 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Do you have any other comments about this patch?
>
Not really, but I'm not 100% convinced the patch is worthwhile. It's
likely to only be used by Linux, which has kexec facilities, and you can
put talk to management via virtio-serial and describe the
On 03/09/2012 03:21 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >>
> >> Changes from v2 to v3:
> >> 1. correct spelling
> >>
> >> Changes from v1 to v2:
> >> 1. split up host and guest-side changes
> >> 2. introduce new request flag to avoid changing return values.
> >
> > I see no Documentation/ changes.
>
> What
At 03/09/2012 09:21 AM, Wen Congyang Wrote:
> At 03/08/2012 07:13 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
>> On 03/08/2012 09:57 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
>>> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>>>
>>> Another purpose of this feature is: management
At 03/08/2012 07:13 PM, Avi Kivity Wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 09:57 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
>> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>>
>> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
>> libvirt) can do auto dump when
On 03/08/2012 09:57 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>
> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
> libvirt) can do auto dump when the guest is crashed. If management
> app does no
We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
But we do not have such feature on kvm.
Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
libvirt) can do auto dump when the guest is crashed. If management
app does not do auto dump, the guest's user can do dump by hand if
79 matches
Mail list logo
