Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Release SMP restriction on Windows host

2013-04-12 Thread Olivier Hainque
On Apr 12, 2013, at 08:40 , Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Do we need an additional Signed-off from the author (Olivier Hainque)? >> Currently, only Fabien signed these patches. > > In theory yes, in practice they are colleagues so I think it's fine. We are colleagues indeed and there's no problem h

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Release SMP restriction on Windows host

2013-04-11 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 11/04/2013 20:57, Stefan Weil ha scritto: > On 09.04.2013 18:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > > Do we need an additional Signed-off from the author (Olivier Hainque)? > Currently, only Fabien signed these patches. In theory yes, in practice they are colleagues so I thin

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Release SMP restriction on Windows host

2013-04-11 Thread Stefan Weil
On 09.04.2013 18:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini Do we need an additional Signed-off from the author (Olivier Hainque)? Currently, only Fabien signed these patches. I'm preparing a pull request and was not sure about this point. Regards, Stefan W.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Release SMP restriction on Windows host

2013-04-09 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 09/04/2013 18:06, Fabien Chouteau ha scritto: > As I already explained to this mailling list, we (AdaCore) use QEMU to run a > lot of short executable (~2 secs) on many different targets. In that > configuration the SMP restriction on Windows (QEMU runs only on 1 core) was > not > efficient on

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Release SMP restriction on Windows host

2013-04-09 Thread Fabien Chouteau
As I already explained to this mailling list, we (AdaCore) use QEMU to run a lot of short executable (~2 secs) on many different targets. In that configuration the SMP restriction on Windows (QEMU runs only on 1 core) was not efficient on our 16 cores servers. Few months ago I asked on this mailin