Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement setxattr/getxattr/removexattr syscalls

2011-09-02 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:30:53PM -0700, An-Cheng Huang wrote: On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:30:52PM -0700, An-Cheng Huang wrote: These patches implement the setxattr, getxattr, and removexattr syscalls. Since libattr uses indirect syscalls for these, the fix for the indirect syscall

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement setxattr/getxattr/removexattr syscalls

2011-08-25 Thread An-Cheng Huang
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:30:53PM -0700, An-Cheng Huang wrote: On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:30:52PM -0700, An-Cheng Huang wrote: These patches implement the setxattr, getxattr, and removexattr syscalls. Since libattr uses indirect syscalls for these, the fix for the indirect syscall handling

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement setxattr/getxattr/removexattr syscalls

2011-08-17 Thread An-Cheng Huang
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:30:52PM -0700, An-Cheng Huang wrote: These patches implement the setxattr, getxattr, and removexattr syscalls. Since libattr uses indirect syscalls for these, the fix for the indirect syscall handling on MIPS is needed for these to work. An-Cheng Huang (3):

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement setxattr/getxattr/removexattr syscalls

2011-08-09 Thread An-Cheng Huang
These patches implement the setxattr, getxattr, and removexattr syscalls. Since libattr uses indirect syscalls for these, the fix for the indirect syscall handling on MIPS is needed for these to work. An-Cheng Huang (3): linux-user: Fix MIPS indirect syscall handling linux-user: Verify MIPS