Hi,
This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. It adds a new
"make check" target which can be used to run all unit tests which are
currently in the tree. It also enables the unit tests by default, so
you don't have to re-run configure with a special switch.
cheers,
Gerd
Gerd Ho
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. It adds a new
> > "make check" target which can be used to run all unit tests which are
> > currently in the tree. It also enable
On 10/24/2011 01:43 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
Hi,
This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. It adds a new
"make check" target which can be used to run all unit tests which are
currently
Am 24.10.2011 20:57, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 10/24/2011 01:43 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Gerd Hoffmann writes:
>>>
Hi,
This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. It adds a new
"make
Hi,
>> I was hoping for more, but maybe we just need to start here and grow
>> organically, I'll queue it again.
>
> A while ago I played with some simple IDE tests. It basically was a
> small x86 kernel with an empty image that sends IDE commands and prints
> some results, and a script that i
Am 25.10.2011 15:27, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
> Hi,
>
>>> I was hoping for more, but maybe we just need to start here and grow
>>> organically, I'll queue it again.
>>
>> A while ago I played with some simple IDE tests. It basically was a
>> small x86 kernel with an empty image that sends IDE com
On 10/25/2011 07:21 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 20:57, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/24/2011 01:43 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:55:20AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
Hi,
This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. I
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:27:35PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
[...]
> > A while ago I played with some simple IDE tests. It basically was a
> > small x86 kernel with an empty image that sends IDE commands and prints
> > some results, and a script that invokes the guest and checks whether the
> > t
Am 25.10.2011 17:03, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:27:35PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> [...]
>>> A while ago I played with some simple IDE tests. It basically was a
>>> small x86 kernel with an empty image that sends IDE commands and prints
>>> some results, and a script t
Hi,
> Just trying to enumerate the kind of tests somebody may need:
>
> A) Simple unit tests for internal qemu C functions
>- 'make check' can run them, using either libcheck or gtest.
Yes, those tests should work and succeed anywhere where qemu compiles.
> B) Functional tests that tests
On 10/25/2011 01:03 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:27:35PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
[...]
A while ago I played with some simple IDE tests. It basically was a
small x86 kernel with an empty image that sends IDE commands and prints
some results, and a script that invokes
On 10/25/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 17:03, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
I think qemu-iotests could be considered an instance of B)
C) Functional tests that just need to run a small binary with no OS
installed in the guest, but running a fully-feature qemu process.
- The
Am 26.10.2011 22:49, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 10/25/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 25.10.2011 17:03, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
>> I think qemu-iotests could be considered an instance of B)
>>
>>> C) Functional tests that just need to run a small binary with no OS
>>> installed in th
On 10/27/2011 03:20 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 22:49, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 17:03, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
I think qemu-iotests could be considered an instance of B)
C) Functional tests that just need to run a small binary w
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:58:32 -0500, Anthony Liguori
wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 03:20 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 26.10.2011 22:49, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> >> On 10/25/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> Am 25.10.2011 17:03, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> >>> I think qemu-iotests could be considere
On 09/01/2011 10:42 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. It adds a new
"make check" target which can be used to run all unit tests which are
currently in the tree. It also enables the unit tests by default, so
you don't have to re-run configure
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series intends to make unit testing easier. It adds a new
> "make check" target which can be used to run all unit tests which are
> currently in the tree. It also enables the unit tests by default, so
> you don't have to re-run configure with a speci
17 matches
Mail list logo
