> -Original Message-
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 10:25 PM
> To: Gonglei (Arei)
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; pbonz...@redhat.com; Huangweidong (C);
> stefa...@redhat.com; Zhoujian (jay); pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; longpeng;
> xin.z.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 05:03:05PM +0800, Gonglei wrote:
> I posted the RFC verion five months ago for DPDK
> vhost-crypto implmention, and now it's time to send
> the formal version. Because we need an user space scheme
> for better performance.
>
> The vhost user crypto server side patches had b
On 21/12/2017 01:51, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> Sorry, Michael. This makes me confused. Because the Qemu part about
> vhost-user crypto
> doesn't do this assumption. The main controversial point is whether session
> operations
> should be added in the vhost-user protocol, raised by Paolo. And we ma
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:51:12AM +, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 1:39 AM
> > To: Gonglei (Arei)
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; pbonz...@redhat.com; Huangweidong (C);
> > s
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 1:39 AM
> To: Gonglei (Arei)
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; pbonz...@redhat.com; Huangweidong (C);
> stefa...@redhat.com; Zhoujian (jay); pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; longpeng;
> xin.z.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:03:16AM +, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> Ping...
>
> Fan (working for DPDK parts) is waiting for those patches upstreamed. :)
>
> Thanks,
> -Gonglei
As far as I am concerned, the main issue is that it says it assumes
polling. virtio does not work like this right now. A
Ping...
Fan (working for DPDK parts) is waiting for those patches upstreamed. :)
Thanks,
-Gonglei
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonglei (Arei)
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 5:03 PM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: m...@redhat.com; pbonz...@redhat.com; Huangweidong (C);
> stefa...@r
I posted the RFC verion five months ago for DPDK
vhost-crypto implmention, and now it's time to send
the formal version. Because we need an user space scheme
for better performance.
The vhost user crypto server side patches had been
sent to DPDK community, pls see
[RFC PATCH 0/6] lib/librte_vhost
