On Fri, 01/09 10:07, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 09/01/2015 03:10, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 01/08 11:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> The current pointer free API for timers is very low level. Introduce
> >> a new API that matches timer_new_ns/us/ms and also a new API timer_deinit
> >> that c
On 09/01/2015 03:10, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 01/08 11:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The current pointer free API for timers is very low level. Introduce
>> a new API that matches timer_new_ns/us/ms and also a new API timer_deinit
>> that can be used instead of timer_free.
>>
>> Finally, mechani
On Thu, 01/08 11:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The current pointer free API for timers is very low level. Introduce
> a new API that matches timer_new_ns/us/ms and also a new API timer_deinit
> that can be used instead of timer_free.
>
> Finally, mechanically change timer macro names in vmstate, to
The current pointer free API for timers is very low level. Introduce
a new API that matches timer_new_ns/us/ms and also a new API timer_deinit
that can be used instead of timer_free.
Finally, mechanically change timer macro names in vmstate, to make it
clear that they accept a pointer.
This prep
