On 13/05/2015 06:48, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
are these patches finally in? if so, what repo/branch should I use to get
them?
Note that v3 was sent quite recently and there should be some time to
give everyone a chance to comment. I was planning to send it out later,
together with UHI via
On 13 May 2015 at 10:29, Leon Alrae leon.al...@imgtec.com wrote:
On 13/05/2015 06:48, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
are these patches finally in? if so, what repo/branch should I use to get
them?
Note that v3 was sent quite recently and there should be some time to
give everyone a chance to comment.
On 06 May 2015, at 19:12, Leon Alrae leon.al...@imgtec.com wrote:
... I'm going to follow up with UHI
patch series only. I don't have anything set up to test other
semihosting interfaces, thus I don't plan to do any changes in these
areas in near future. Therefore feel free to send your
On 06/05/2015 16:22, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
apparently your patch does not fix the arm semihosting problems. do you plan
a separate patch for this?
This patchset doesn't contain any target semihosting specific changes
(just a clean up and new arg option). I'm going to follow up with UHI
patch
apparently your patch does not fix the arm semihosting problems. do you plan a
separate patch for this?
bool semihosting_enabled(void)
{
return semihosting.allowed;
}
any particular reason for naming the structure member .allowed and the getter
function _enabled()?
regards,
Liviu
Hi,
This patch series adds arg= sub-option to --semihosting-config group. It
allows building up a list of input arguments as it can appear multiple
times in the command line. This is a flexible solution for creating
argc/argv for the guest program (needed by UHI semihosting for example).
RFC
