At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
with good performance.
However, we are running into a problem: changing size breaks
migration every time.
This already requires somewhat messy compatibility sup
On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:11:13], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> And to make it clear, I'd like to see review from
> migration maintainers on this.
> The patchset crosses into pc so it's probably best to
> merge through my tree to avoic conflicts.
Fine by me.
Amit
On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:08:46], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
> changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
> with good performance.
> However, we are running into a problem: changing size breaks
> migrati
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:01:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:08:46], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
> > changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
> > with good performance.
> > H
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>>
>> > At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
>> > changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
>> > with goo
On (Wed) 19 Nov 2014 [10:15:16], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:01:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:08:46], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Note: migration stream is unaffected by these patches.
> > > This makes it possible to enable this functional
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:52:35PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 19 Nov 2014 [10:15:16], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:01:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:08:46], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > > > Note: migration stream is unaffected by
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:16:09AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> >>
> >> > At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
> >> > chan
On 19 November 2014 07:31, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:08:46], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Considering this promises to rid us of worries about ROM size considerations
>> once and for all, I thinking about pushing this as a "kind of bugfix" before
>> 2.2, so we don't need to maint
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:52:35PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Wed) 19 Nov 2014 [10:15:16], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:01:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
>> > > On (Mon) 17 Nov 2014 [22:08:46], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>> > > > Note
On 19/11/2014 14:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> It certainly seems pretty risky to introduce this change with
> only two weeks to go til release; I wouldn't want to merge it
> without a strong consensus from everybody involved that it
> really needed to go in for 2.2.
I think there's consensus (you,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 19/11/2014 14:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > It certainly seems pretty risky to introduce this change with
> > only two weeks to go til release; I wouldn't want to merge it
> > without a strong consensus from everybody involved
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:52:43PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:52:35PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> >> On (Wed) 19 Nov 2014 [10:15:16], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:01:14PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> >> > > On
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/11/2014 14:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> It certainly seems pretty risky to introduce this change with
>> only two weeks to go til release; I wouldn't want to merge it
>> without a strong consensus from everybody involved that it
>> really needed to go in for 2.2.
>
> I
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:08:46PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
> changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
> with good performance.
> However, we are running into a problem: changing size breaks
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
> > changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
> > with good performance.
> > However, we are run
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> At the moment we migrate ROMs which reside in fw cfg, which allows
> changing ROM code at will, and supports migrating largish blocks early,
> with good performance.
> However, we are running into a problem: changing size breaks
> migration every time.
Pardon my ig
17 matches
Mail list logo
