On 2015/1/29 10:21, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 05:31 PM, Gonglei wrote:
>> On 2015/1/28 19:16, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>> I screwed up cc: qemu-trivial, my apologies.
>>>
>
Markus Armbruster (6):
onenand: g_malloc() can't fail, bury dead error handling
rtl8139: g_ma
On 01/28/2015 05:31 PM, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2015/1/28 19:16, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> I screwed up cc: qemu-trivial, my apologies.
>>
>>> Markus Armbruster (6):
>>> onenand: g_malloc() can't fail, bury dead error handling
>>> rtl8139: g_malloc() can't fail, bury dead error handling
>>>
On 2015/1/28 19:16, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I screwed up cc: qemu-trivial, my apologies.
>
> Markus Armbruster writes:
>
>> I'm routing these patches through qemu-trivial, even though some of
>> them touch actively maintained code, and could go through the
>> respective tree instead:
>>
>> *
I screwed up cc: qemu-trivial, my apologies.
Markus Armbruster writes:
> I'm routing these patches through qemu-trivial, even though some of
> them touch actively maintained code, and could go through the
> respective tree instead:
>
> * PATCH 1 block (Kevin, Stefan)
>
> * PATCH 3 KVM (Paolo)
>
[your mail used the wrong address for qemu-trivial; I'm redirecting my
reply]
On 01/27/2015 09:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I'm routing these patches through qemu-trivial, even though some of
> them touch actively maintained code, and could go through the
> respective tree instead:
>
> * PAT
I'm routing these patches through qemu-trivial, even though some of
them touch actively maintained code, and could go through the
respective tree instead:
* PATCH 1 block (Kevin, Stefan)
* PATCH 3 KVM (Paolo)
* PATCH 4 migration (Juan, Amit)
* PATCH 5 VNC (Gerd)
If you want me to reroute any o
