Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-05-13 Thread Peter Maydell
On 12 May 2016 at 02:46, 赵小强 wrote: > > 在 2016-03-31 16:15:17，"xiaoqiang zhao" 写道： >> >> >>> 在 2016年3月31日，16:05，Peter Maydell 写道： >>> On 31 March 2016 at 02:48, xiaoqiang zhao wrote: > 在

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-05-11 Thread 赵小强
在 2016-03-31 16:15:17，"xiaoqiang zhao" 写道： > > >> 在 2016年3月31日，16:05，Peter Maydell 写道： >> >>> On 31 March 2016 at 02:48, xiaoqiang zhao wrote: >>> 在 2016年03月16日 20:00, Peter Maydell 写道: > On 16 March 2016 at

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-31 Thread xiaoqiang zhao
> 在 2016年3月31日，16:05，Peter Maydell 写道： > >> On 31 March 2016 at 02:48, xiaoqiang zhao wrote: >> >>> 在 2016年03月16日 20:00, Peter Maydell 写道: >>> On 16 March 2016 at 11:31, Peter Maydell wrote: A general

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-31 Thread Peter Maydell
On 31 March 2016 at 02:48, xiaoqiang zhao wrote: > > 在 2016年03月16日 20:00, Peter Maydell 写道: >> >> On 16 March 2016 at 11:31, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> >>> A general note -- since these aren't bug fixes and we're in soft >>> freeze now, I don't think

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-30 Thread xiaoqiang zhao
在 2016年03月16日 20:00, Peter Maydell 写道: On 16 March 2016 at 11:31, Peter Maydell wrote: A general note -- since these aren't bug fixes and we're in soft freeze now, I don't think we should put them in until 2.6 is out. I'll review the patches in a second, though.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-20 Thread xiaoqiang zhao
> 在 2016年3月16日，20:00，Peter Maydell 写道： > >> On 16 March 2016 at 11:31, Peter Maydell wrote: >> A general note -- since these aren't bug fixes and we're in soft >> freeze now, I don't think we should put them in until 2.6 is out. >> I'll

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-19 Thread Peter Maydell
On 16 March 2016 at 11:31, Peter Maydell wrote: > A general note -- since these aren't bug fixes and we're in soft > freeze now, I don't think we should put them in until 2.6 is out. > I'll review the patches in a second, though. Well, the patches all look good -- ping

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-19 Thread Peter Maydell
On 7 March 2016 at 07:05, xiaoqiang zhao wrote: > This patch set trying to QOM'ify code under hw/arm directory. > As previous patches to hw/timer/*, we use instance_init instead of > the SysBus's init function. > > > xiaoqiang zhao (9): > hw/arm: QOM'ify armv7m.c > hw/arm:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-15 Thread zxq_yx_007
At 2016-03-07 15:05:41, "xiaoqiang zhao" wrote: >This patch set trying to QOM'ify code under hw/arm directory. >As previous patches to hw/timer/*, we use instance_init instead of >the SysBus's init function. > > >xiaoqiang zhao (9): > hw/arm: QOM'ify armv7m.c > hw/arm:

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] some QOM'ify work under hw/arm

2016-03-06 Thread xiaoqiang zhao
This patch set trying to QOM'ify code under hw/arm directory. As previous patches to hw/timer/*, we use instance_init instead of the SysBus's init function. xiaoqiang zhao (9): hw/arm: QOM'ify armv7m.c hw/arm: QOM'ify highbank.c hw/arm: QOM'ify integratorcp.c hw/arm: QOM'ify pxa2xx.c