On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:38:36 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:10:06PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > While working on adding tests for virt/arm board (uefi/XSDT/64-bit table
> > pointers),
> > I found it's rather difficult to deal with mixed ACPI testing code that
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:45:17PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:38:36AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:10:06PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > While working on adding tests for virt/arm board (uefi/XSDT/64-bit table
> > > pointers
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:38:36AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:10:06PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > While working on adding tests for virt/arm board (uefi/XSDT/64-bit table
> > pointers),
> > I found it's rather difficult to deal with mixed ACPI testing code th
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:10:06PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> While working on adding tests for virt/arm board (uefi/XSDT/64-bit table
> pointers),
> I found it's rather difficult to deal with mixed ACPI testing code that we've
> collected so far. So instead of just adding a pile of XSDT hacks
While working on adding tests for virt/arm board (uefi/XSDT/64-bit table
pointers),
I found it's rather difficult to deal with mixed ACPI testing code that we've
collected so far. So instead of just adding a pile of XSDT hacks on top, here
goes small refactoring series:
* that removes dead code
