Hi,
>> Ok, so it looks like 1-3 are clear bugfixes which are needed in 1.3
>>
> Moving it forward in the patch-set will cause a conflict though, I'll go
> and
> do the reshuffle myself, throw in 2 usb-redir fixes and then send a new set
Oh, and I've picked 1-3 already, no need to resend them.
On 11/15/12 12:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/15/2012 09:55 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> On 11/14/12 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet
>>> handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite
>>> a
Hi,
On 11/15/2012 09:55 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 11/14/12 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote:
While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet
handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite
a few ehci bugs.
Unfortunately the moving to async for inte
On 11/14/12 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote:
> While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet
> handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite
> a few ehci bugs.
>
> Unfortunately the moving to async for interrupt endpoints turns out to be a
> bad ide
While working on moving usb-redir and usb-hid over to using async packet
handling for their interrupt input endpoints. I've found and fixed quite
a few ehci bugs.
Unfortunately the moving to async for interrupt endpoints turns out to be a
bad idea, as it causes issues for migration, an async compl
