Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] cpu model bug fixes and definition corrections (v2)

2011-06-09 Thread Markus Armbruster
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com writes: [...] Something else I may have missed? Nothing critical, I'm just hoping someone finds the time to fix sysconfigs loading when starting qemu from a build directory. :) There's nice to have, important, critical, and really annoying. This one's

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] cpu model bug fixes and definition corrections (v2)

2011-06-03 Thread Eduardo Habkost
(CCing Marcelo, Avi, and kvm mailing list, so they can help answering the uq/master patch flow question) On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:51:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-06-02 21:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote: Ouch, the subject prefix is completely wrong because of broken git-send-email

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] cpu model bug fixes and definition corrections (v2)

2011-06-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-06-03 16:38, Eduardo Habkost wrote: (CCing Marcelo, Avi, and kvm mailing list, so they can help answering the uq/master patch flow question) On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 12:51:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2011-06-02 21:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote: Ouch, the subject prefix is completely

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] cpu model bug fixes and definition corrections (v2)

2011-06-02 Thread Eduardo Habkost
Ouch, the subject prefix is completely wrong because of broken git-send-email config on my side, sorry. Please ignore the 'RHEL6 qemu-kvm' prefix, it is actually supposed to go to the main Qemu tree. -- Eduardo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] cpu model bug fixes and definition corrections (v2)

2011-06-02 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2011-06-02 21:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote: Ouch, the subject prefix is completely wrong because of broken git-send-email config on my side, sorry. Please ignore the 'RHEL6 qemu-kvm' prefix, it is actually supposed to go to the main Qemu tree. Some of my review comments on John's original