With the recent KVM guest SVE support pull request [1] KVM will be
ready for guests with SVE. This series provides the QEMU bits for
that enablement. The series starts with the bits needed for the KVM
SVE ioctls. Then it enables the arm 'max'cpu type, which with TCG
already supports SVE, to also su
On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
[...]
>CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
>---
> 1) max | tcg | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> 2) max | kvm | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> 3)host | kvm | N/A | $VLS_MAP
On Sun, 12 May 2019 at 09:36, Andrew Jones wrote:
>
> With the recent KVM guest SVE support pull request [1] KVM will be
> ready for guests with SVE. This series provides the QEMU bits for
> that enablement. The series starts with the bits needed for the KVM
> SVE ioctls. Then it enables the arm '
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:32:46AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> [...]
> >CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
> >---
> > 1) max | tcg | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> > 2) max |
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:32:46AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> [...]
> >CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
> >---
> > 1) max | tcg | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> > 2) max |
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:15:56PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:32:46AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > [...]
> > >CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
> > >---
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:52:06AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2019 at 09:36, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >
> > With the recent KVM guest SVE support pull request [1] KVM will be
> > ready for guests with SVE. This series provides the QEMU bits for
> > that enablement. The series starts
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:38:57PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:15:56PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:32:46AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
[...]
> > > > The QMP query returns a lis
On 5/12/19 1:36 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
>CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
>---
> 1) max | tcg | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> 2) max | kvm | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> 3)host | kvm | N/A | $VLS_MAP
This doesn't seem r
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:46:29AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 5/12/19 1:36 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
> >---
> > 1) max | tcg | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> > 2) max | kvm | $MAX_VQ |
On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 19:46, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 5/12/19 1:36 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
> >---
> > 1) max | tcg | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
> > 2) max | kvm | $MAX_VQ | $VLS_MAP
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 14:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:32:46AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > [...]
> > >CPU type | accel | sve-max-vq | sve-vls-map
> > >---
>
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 02:29:51PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 14:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:32:46AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 10:36 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > >CPU type | accel | sve
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 02:29:51PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Since we expect management applications to use QMP to discover what
> > vector lengths are supported and then provide an explicit map, I
> > think it's fair to say that the
On 5/14/19 9:03 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> We already have sve-max-vq, so I'm not sure we want to rename it.
>
> Oh, I didn't realize that was the case. And of course it already
> takes a number of quadwords as argument, I suppose? That'
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 13:14 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 5/14/19 9:03 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > We already have sve-max-vq, so I'm not sure we want to rename it.
> >
> > Oh, I didn't realize that was the case. And of course
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 06:03:09PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I thought about it a bit more and perhaps the simplified design is
> better after all.
>
> Whatever the interface looks like on the QEMU side, we're going to
> want to offer libvirt users two options for configuring vector
> lengt
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:03:58AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 13:14 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 5/14/19 9:03 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:53 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > We already have sve-max-vq, so I'm not sure we want to
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 12:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:03:58AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 13:14 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > Why is =4 less user-friendly than =512?
> > >
> > > I don't actually see "total bits in vector" as more us
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:28:20PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 12:14 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:03:58AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 13:14 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > > Why is =4 less user-friendly than
20 matches
Mail list logo
