On 01/15/2015 07:01 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I was looking at our confusing mess of memory accessor functions,
> and I realised that partly it was confusing because we have a
> bunch of unnecessary junk lurking in there :-) This series
> attempts to clean things up by removing things we weren't u
On 15/01/2015 20:10, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 15 January 2015 at 15:32, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>>> I haven't reviewed the patches, but that's a much appreciated cleanup! I was
>>> also trying to make sense of all the variants while implementing guest
>>> memory
>>>
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 15 January 2015 at 15:32, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> I haven't reviewed the patches, but that's a much appreciated cleanup! I was
>> also trying to make sense of all the variants while implementing guest memory
>> access tracing
> I drew the following terrible ASCII art
On 15 January 2015 at 15:32, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the patches, but that's a much appreciated cleanup! I was
> also trying to make sense of all the variants while implementing guest memory
> access tracing
I drew the following terrible ASCII art diagram of the remaining
memor
Peter Maydell writes:
> I was looking at our confusing mess of memory accessor functions,
> and I realised that partly it was confusing because we have a
> bunch of unnecessary junk lurking in there :-) This series
> attempts to clean things up by removing things we weren't using
> at all or were
I was looking at our confusing mess of memory accessor functions,
and I realised that partly it was confusing because we have a
bunch of unnecessary junk lurking in there :-) This series
attempts to clean things up by removing things we weren't using
at all or were only using by mistake in a few pl
