On 12/01/2011 08:48 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/01/2011 04:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
We need good tools to allow easy review of the ABI bits hiding in
patches, and to maintain ABI compatibility. Something like
qemu-print-abi that dumps all properties for all devices. Patches could
show
On 12/01/2011 04:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>>
>> We need good tools to allow easy review of the ABI bits hiding in
>> patches, and to maintain ABI compatibility. Something like
>> qemu-print-abi that dumps all properties for all devices. Patches could
>> show the ABI changes by including a
On 12/01/2011 08:20 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/30/2011 11:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a follow up to my previous series to get us started in the QOM
direction. A few things are different this time around. Most notably:
1) Devices no longer have names. Instead, path names are alw
On 11/30/2011 11:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This is a follow up to my previous series to get us started in the QOM
> direction. A few things are different this time around. Most notably:
>
> 1) Devices no longer have names. Instead, path names are always used to
> identify devices.
>
>
On 11/30/2011 03:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a follow up to my previous series to get us started in the QOM
direction. A few things are different this time around. Most notably:
1) Devices no longer have names. Instead, path names are always used to
identify devices.
2) In
This is a follow up to my previous series to get us started in the QOM
direction. A few things are different this time around. Most notably:
1) Devices no longer have names. Instead, path names are always used to
identify devices.
2) In order to support (1), dynamic properties are now su
