On 13 September 2014 17:45, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Prompted by trying to review Martin's ARM exception vs gdb
> problems, let's clean up cpu_exec so that it's almost readable.
>
> After the 23 patches, there's one (interesting) ifdef left.
> That is, i386 redefining CPU_INTERRUPT_RESET as CPU_
Il 13/09/2014 18:44, Richard Henderson ha scritto:
>
> After the 23 patches, there's one (interesting) ifdef left.
> That is, i386 redefining CPU_INTERRUPT_RESET as CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT
> for its own purposes. I'm not sure why all that couldn't be done
> under whatever hooks cpu_reset allows.
Ther
Prompted by trying to review Martin's ARM exception vs gdb
problems, let's clean up cpu_exec so that it's almost readable.
After the 23 patches, there's one (interesting) ifdef left.
That is, i386 redefining CPU_INTERRUPT_RESET as CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT
for its own purposes. I'm not sure why all that
Prompted by trying to review Martin's ARM exception vs gdb
problems, let's clean up cpu_exec so that it's almost readable.
After the 23 patches, there's one (interesting) ifdef left.
That is, i386 redefining CPU_INTERRUPT_RESET as CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT
for its own purposes. I'm not sure why all that
