On 10/01/2013 08:48 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/30/2013 09:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/30/2013 11:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/23/2013 04:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rather than simply hard-coding them in STFL instruction.
Signed-off-by: Richard
On 09/30/2013 09:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/30/2013 11:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/23/2013 04:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rather than simply hard-coding them in STFL instruction.
Signed-off-by: Richard Hendersonr...@twiddle.net
---
target-s390x/cpu.c | 3 +++
On 10/01/2013 05:52 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/01/2013 08:48 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/30/2013 09:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/30/2013 11:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/23/2013 04:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rather than simply hard-coding them in STFL
On 10/01/2013 08:54 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Just make sure you actually check for feature bits on every instruction (which
I think you do, but the current code is way too magical to me to really
understand it anymore) so that we can always implement a z900 cpu type later
on.
Yes, the code
On 09/23/2013 04:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rather than simply hard-coding them in STFL instruction.
Signed-off-by: Richard Hendersonr...@twiddle.net
---
target-s390x/cpu.c | 3 +++
target-s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
target-s390x/translate.c | 10 +-
3 files changed, 9
On 09/30/2013 11:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 09/23/2013 04:04 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Rather than simply hard-coding them in STFL instruction.
Signed-off-by: Richard Hendersonr...@twiddle.net
---
target-s390x/cpu.c | 3 +++
target-s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
Rather than simply hard-coding them in STFL instruction.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
---
target-s390x/cpu.c | 3 +++
target-s390x/cpu.h | 1 +
target-s390x/translate.c | 10 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
