On 02/04/2012 12:51 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/04/2012 04:03 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
There's no object_ref() in qdev_device_add(). The 2 references come
from adding a child link to /peripheral and via object_new().
Sure, but there's when the object_new() reference becomes unreachable.
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The reference that is returned by qdev_device_add is never given
back, so that device_del does not cause the refcount to go to zero
(and thus does nothing).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzinipbonz...@redhat.com
This isn't needed in qom-upstream.14.
On 02/02/2012 01:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.02.2012, at 20:01, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with qom-upstream.14? I fixed a bug on .14 that
involved child properties that
On 03.02.2012, at 17:37, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/02/2012 01:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.02.2012, at 20:01, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with
On 02/03/2012 10:57 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 03.02.2012, at 17:37, Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/02/2012 01:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.02.2012, at 20:01, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony
On 02/03/2012 03:27 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The reference that is returned by qdev_device_add is never given
back, so that device_del does not cause the refcount to go to zero
(and thus does nothing).
Signed-off-by: Paolo
On 02/03/2012 06:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/03/2012 03:27 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The reference that is returned by qdev_device_add is never given
back, so that device_del does not cause the refcount to go to zero
(and thus does nothing).
On 02/04/2012 04:03 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
There's no object_ref() in qdev_device_add(). The 2 references come
from adding a child link to /peripheral and via object_new().
Sure, but there's when the object_new() reference becomes unreachable.
At this point, if it weren't for /peripheral
The reference that is returned by qdev_device_add is never given
back, so that device_del does not cause the refcount to go to zero
(and thus does nothing).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com
---
vl.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vl.c
On 02/02/2012 10:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The reference that is returned by qdev_device_add is never given
back, so that device_del does not cause the refcount to go to zero
(and thus does nothing).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzinipbonz...@redhat.com
---
vl.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with qom-upstream.14? I fixed a bug on .14 that
involved child properties that was making device-del sometimes fail.
Not sure, I tried with .13 but, from the look of it, it should still be
there. Regarding the .13-.14
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with qom-upstream.14? I fixed a bug on .14 that
involved child properties that was making device-del sometimes fail.
Not sure, I tried with .13 but, from the look of it, it
On 02.02.2012, at 20:01, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with qom-upstream.14? I fixed a bug on .14 that
involved child properties that was making device-del sometimes fail.
Not
On 02/02/2012 01:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.02.2012, at 20:01, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with qom-upstream.14? I fixed a bug on .14 that
involved child properties that
On 02.02.2012, at 21:03, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 01:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.02.2012, at 20:01, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/02/2012 11:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/02/2012 06:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Is this still needed with qom-upstream.14? I
15 matches
Mail list logo