On 03/10/2010 04:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The code is initializing an unsigned int to UINT_MAX using "-1", so that
the following always-true comparison seems to be always-false at a
first look. Since alarm timer initializations are never nested, it is
simpler to unconditionally store the resu
The code is initializing an unsigned int to UINT_MAX using "-1", so that
the following always-true comparison seems to be always-false at a
first look. Since alarm timer initializations are never nested, it is
simpler to unconditionally store the result of timeGetDevCaps into
data->period.
Signed
