On 25 April 2018 at 15:36, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 20.04.2018 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Following commit 12051d82f004024, UART devices should handle
>> being passed a NULL pointer chardev, so we don't need to
>> create "null" backends in board code. Remove the code that
>> does this and updat
On 20.04.2018 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Following commit 12051d82f004024, UART devices should handle
> being passed a NULL pointer chardev, so we don't need to
> create "null" backends in board code. Remove the code that
> does this and updates serial_hds[].
>
> (fsl-imx7.c was already written
On 20.04.2018 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Following commit 12051d82f004024, UART devices should handle
> being passed a NULL pointer chardev, so we don't need to
> create "null" backends in board code. Remove the code that
> does this and updates serial_hds[].
... maybe drop the "updates serial_
On 04/20/2018 11:52 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Following commit 12051d82f004024, UART devices should handle
> being passed a NULL pointer chardev, so we don't need to
> create "null" backends in board code. Remove the code that
> does this and updates serial_hds[].
>
> (fsl-imx7.c was already writ
Following commit 12051d82f004024, UART devices should handle
being passed a NULL pointer chardev, so we don't need to
create "null" backends in board code. Remove the code that
does this and updates serial_hds[].
(fsl-imx7.c was already written this way.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
hw/arm
