On 5/5/19 2:52 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Right, it looks like VSX_CMP is the culprit here. Am I right in thinking that
> it's
> best to remove the opc parameter from GEN_VSX_HELPER_X3 above, and then have a
> separate gen and helper function for just the VSX_CMP instructions?
> Presumably
On 30/04/2019 17:36, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 4/28/19 7:38 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> +#define GEN_VSX_HELPER_X3(name, op1, op2, inval, type)
>> \
>> +static void gen_##name(DisasContext *ctx)
>> \
>> +{
On 4/28/19 7:38 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> +#define GEN_VSX_HELPER_X3(name, op1, op2, inval, type)
> \
> +static void gen_##name(DisasContext *ctx)
> \
> +{
>
Rather than perform the VSR register decoding within the helper itself,
introduce a new GEN_VSX_HELPER_X3 macro which performs the decode based
upon xT, xA and xB at translation time.
Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland
---
target/ppc/fpu_helper.c | 48 ---
target/ppc/helper.h
