Hi
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:06 PM Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 11:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> >
> > QMP clients that work around the "large positive integers are rejected"
> > bugs by sending large negative ones instead may well exist. Fixing the
> > interface
On 03/21/2017 11:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> QMP clients that work around the "large positive integers are rejected"
> bugs by sending large negative ones instead may well exist. Fixing the
> interface would break them. Depressing. Eric, could you have a peek at
> libvirt?
Yes,
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:29 PM Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 03/13/2017 02:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> > Eric Blake writes:
>> >
>> >> On
Hi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:29 PM Marc-André Lureau
wrote:
Hi
- Original Message -
> On 03/13/2017 02:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Eric Blake writes:
> >
> >> On 03/11/2017 07:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >>> The type is not used at
Hi
- Original Message -
> On 03/13/2017 02:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Eric Blake writes:
> >
> >> On 03/11/2017 07:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >>> The type is not used at all yet. Add some tests to exercice it.
> >>
> >> s/exercice/exercise/
> >>
> >> I
On 03/13/2017 02:15 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> On 03/11/2017 07:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>> The type is not used at all yet. Add some tests to exercice it.
>>
>> s/exercice/exercise/
>>
>> I wonder if we need this patch at all.
>>
>> I've
Eric Blake writes:
> On 03/11/2017 07:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> The type is not used at all yet. Add some tests to exercice it.
>
> s/exercice/exercise/
>
> I wonder if we need this patch at all.
>
> I've been thinking about a possible alternative representation, such
On 03/11/2017 07:22 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> The type is not used at all yet. Add some tests to exercice it.
s/exercice/exercise/
I wonder if we need this patch at all.
I've been thinking about a possible alternative representation, such
that a single QInt type can cover _both_ signed and
The type is not used at all yet. Add some tests to exercice it.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
---
qapi/introspect.json | 2 +-
scripts/qapi.py | 28 ---
include/qapi/qmp/quint.h | 25