On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 20:20 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 June 2014 16:33, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > I think there's some confusion between the strace support for the new
> > print_sysarch() and the existing syscall do_freebsd_sysarch().
>
> Only because you've put parts of both in the same pat
On 15 June 2014 16:33, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I think there's some confusion between the strace support for the new
> print_sysarch() and the existing syscall do_freebsd_sysarch().
Only because you've put parts of both in the same patch :-)
> If I follow the code, the existing do_freebsd_sysarch()
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 23:53 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 June 2014 17:57, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Bruno
> > ---
> > bsd-user/freebsd/os-strace.h | 29 +
> > bsd-user/freebsd/strace.list | 2 +-
> > bsd-user/i386/syscall.h|
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 23:53 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 June 2014 17:57, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Bruno
> > ---
> > bsd-user/freebsd/os-strace.h | 29 +
> > bsd-user/freebsd/strace.list | 2 +-
> > bsd-user/i386/syscall.h|
On 8 June 2014 17:57, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sean Bruno
> ---
> bsd-user/freebsd/os-strace.h | 29 +
> bsd-user/freebsd/strace.list | 2 +-
> bsd-user/i386/syscall.h| 21 +
> bsd-user/i386/target_arch_sysarch.h| 78
> +
Signed-off-by: Sean Bruno
---
bsd-user/freebsd/os-strace.h | 29 +
bsd-user/freebsd/strace.list | 2 +-
bsd-user/i386/syscall.h| 21 +
bsd-user/i386/target_arch_sysarch.h| 78 ++
bsd-user/netbsd/os-strace
