On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:24:31AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Fam Zheng writes:
>
> > On Mon, 04/24 09:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> > Move opaque to 2nd instead of the 2nd to last, so that compilers
Fam Zheng writes:
> On Mon, 04/24 09:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> > Move opaque to 2nd instead of the 2nd to last, so that compilers help
>> > check with the convertion.
>>
>> Moving 'opaque' like this should not
On Mon, 04/24 09:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Move opaque to 2nd instead of the 2nd to last, so that compilers help
> > check with the convertion.
>
> Moving 'opaque' like this should not be done.
>
> If you want the compiler to
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:27:02PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Move opaque to 2nd instead of the 2nd to last, so that compilers help
> check with the convertion.
Moving 'opaque' like this should not be done.
If you want the compiler to check the fixes, it should be done in
just two stages. First
On 04/21/2017 07:27 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Move opaque to 2nd instead of the 2nd to last, so that compilers help
> check with the convertion.
s/convertion/conversion/
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> block/crypto.c| 12 ++--
> crypto/block-luks.c
Move opaque to 2nd instead of the 2nd to last, so that compilers help
check with the convertion.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block/crypto.c| 12 ++--
crypto/block-luks.c | 21 +
include/crypto/block.h| 12 ++--