On 08/23/2010 05:10 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 04:41:44PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
ram_addr_t is not necessarily an unsigned long. It's actually a
uint64_t. Integer promotion should handle this in most cases but
having the definition in two different places wo
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 04:41:44PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> ram_addr_t is not necessarily an unsigned long. It's actually a
> uint64_t. Integer promotion should handle this in most cases but
> having the definition in two different places worries me a bit.
I thought it is unsigned long:
On 08/12/2010 05:36 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
From: Prerna Saxena
Signed-off-by: Prerna Saxena
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
balloon.c|2 ++
trace-events |4
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/balloon.c b/balloon.c
index 8e0b7f1..0021fef 100
From: Prerna Saxena
Signed-off-by: Prerna Saxena
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
balloon.c|2 ++
trace-events |4
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/balloon.c b/balloon.c
index 8e0b7f1..0021fef 100644
--- a/balloon.c
+++ b/balloon.c
@@ -29,6 +29,
