On 07/25/2011 09:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/25/2011 09:02 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
I/O regions will not have ram_addrs, so this is a better name.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
Although it seems squashable.
Yeah, I'm loath
I/O regions will not have ram_addrs, so this is a better name.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
memory.c | 18 +-
memory.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
index 7187223..5fda4a0 100644
--- a/memory.c
On 07/25/2011 09:02 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
I/O regions will not have ram_addrs, so this is a better name.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
Although it seems squashable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
---
memory.c | 18
