Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros? If not, can a patch like this
one be applied?
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
---
vl.c | 11 +++
Am 26.03.2012 17:13, schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros?
Yes, documented somewhere in the archives, we wanted to have
reproducible defaults
Quoting Andreas Färber (afaer...@suse.de):
Am 26.03.2012 17:13, schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros?
Yes, documented somewhere in the
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:13:40 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com
wrote:
Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros? If not, can a patch like this
one be applied?
Quoting Brian Jackson (i...@theiggy.com):
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:13:40 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn
se...@hallyn.com wrote:
Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros? If
On 03/26/2012 10:13 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros? If not, can a patch like this
one be applied?
Signed-off-by: Serge
Quoting Anthony Liguori (anth...@codemonkey.ws):
On 03/26/2012 10:13 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Currently, if the user doesn't pass a uuid, the system uuid is set to
all zeros. This patch generates a random one instead.
Is there a reason to prefer all zeros? If not, can a patch like this
