On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:56:41PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Ping? It's been more than a month since this patch has been posted.
Maybe it is a good candidate for -trivial queue?
One thing I don't understand is where you actually use
@documentencoding? I don't see it in you 2 patches.
On 12.03.2012 12:21, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:56:41PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Ping? It's been more than a month since this patch has been posted.
Maybe it is a good candidate for -trivial queue?
One thing I don't understand is where you actually use
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
On 12.03.2012 12:21, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:56:41PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Ping? It's been more than a month since this patch has been posted.
Maybe it is a good candidate for -trivial
Ping? It's been more than a month since this patch has been posted.
Maybe it is a good candidate for -trivial queue?
Thanks,
/mjt
On 02.02.2012 18:16, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Currently our texi2pod ignores @documentencoding even if it is set
properly in *.texi files. This results in a
Currently our texi2pod ignores @documentencoding even if it is set
properly in *.texi files. This results in a mojibake in documents
generated from qemu.pod (which is generated from qemu-doc.texi by
texi2pod), because the rest of the tools assumes ASCII encoding.
This patch recognizes first
