On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:00:20PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:03:34PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:00:20PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:03:34PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:00:20PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
On Thu, May 9,
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have high MemoryListener priority
than kvm. For currently code, take the following scenario:
kvm_region_add() run earlier before
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have high MemoryListener priority
than kvm. For currently code, take the following scenario:
kvm_region_add() run earlier before
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have high MemoryListener priority
than kvm. For currently code, take
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have high MemoryListener priority
than kvm. For currently code, take
Il 09/05/2013 10:54, liu ping fan ha scritto:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have high MemoryListener
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:00:20PM +0800, liu ping fan wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 08:40:21AM +0800, Liu Ping Fan wrote:
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have
From: Liu Ping Fan pingf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Hosts threads which handle vring should have high MemoryListener priority
than kvm. For currently code, take the following scenario:
kvm_region_add() run earlier before vhost_region_add(), then in guest,
vring's desc[i] can refer to addressX in the
10 matches
Mail list logo