Am 21.08.2015 um 08:12 schrieb Eric Blake:
On 08/20/2015 01:14 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
If the backend storage is unresponsive and we cancel a request due to
a timeout we cannot immediately destroy the AIOCB because the storage
might complete the original request laster if it is responsive again.
On 08/20/2015 01:14 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> If the backend storage is unresponsive and we cancel a request due to
> a timeout we cannot immediately destroy the AIOCB because the storage
> might complete the original request laster if it is responsive again.
s/laster/later/
> For this purpose al
If the backend storage is unresponsive and we cancel a request due to
a timeout we cannot immediately destroy the AIOCB because the storage
might complete the original request laster if it is responsive again.
For this purpose allow to set the callback to NULL and ignore it in
this case.
Signed-of
