On 08/27/12 18:21, Søren Sandmann wrote:
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen s...@redhat.com
It's not uncommon for an X workload to have more than 1024 pixmaps
live at the same time. Ideally, there wouldn't be any fixed limit like
this, but since we have one, increase it to 4096.
---
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/27/12 18:21, Søren Sandmann wrote:
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen s...@redhat.com
It's not uncommon for an X workload to have more than 1024 pixmaps
live at the same time. Ideally, there wouldn't be any fixed limit like
this, but since we have
Hi,
/* move from ARRAY to VARRAY with sive on num_surfaces */
VMSTATE_VARRAY_INT32(guest_surfaces.cmds, PCIQXLDevice, num_surfaces,
0,
vmstate_info_uint64, uint64_t),
Ah. Yes, VARRAY will do, somehow I didn't find it.
And thinking about it, no
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen s...@redhat.com
It's not uncommon for an X workload to have more than 1024 pixmaps
live at the same time. Ideally, there wouldn't be any fixed limit like
this, but since we have one, increase it to 4096.
---
ui/spice-display.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
