On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:46:47AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15.07.2016 05:12, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:57:45AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> The rather random list of check-qtest-xxx entries caused some
> >> confusion in the past, where to use "=" and where to use "
On 15.07.2016 05:12, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:57:45AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The rather random list of check-qtest-xxx entries caused some
>> confusion in the past, where to use "=" and where to use "+="
>> (see commits 0ccac16f59462b8e2b9afbc1 and 1f5c1cfbaec0792cd2e5
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:57:45AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The rather random list of check-qtest-xxx entries caused some
> confusion in the past, where to use "=" and where to use "+="
> (see commits 0ccac16f59462b8e2b9afbc1 and 1f5c1cfbaec0792cd2e5da
> for example).
> Sorting the check-qtest-x
The rather random list of check-qtest-xxx entries caused some
confusion in the past, where to use "=" and where to use "+="
(see commits 0ccac16f59462b8e2b9afbc1 and 1f5c1cfbaec0792cd2e5da
for example).
Sorting the check-qtest-xxx entries by architecure instead and
using some empty lines inbetween
