On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:08:56 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Greg Kurz writes:
>
> > On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:38:13 +0200
> > Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> >> Greg Kurz writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:26:17 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> >
> > Stefan had already sent
> > <1460467534-29147-4-git-send-email-stefa...@redhat.com> ages ago, but
> > it has not yet made it anywhere...
> >
>
> I don't know what to do with this message-id :\
I finally found :)
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:53:05 +0200
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:46:25 +0200
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:30:53 +0200
> > Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:55:16 +0300
> >
Greg Kurz writes:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:38:13 +0200
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Greg Kurz writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
>> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:46:25 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:30:53 +0200
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:55:16 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:26:52PM +0200,
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:30:53 +0200
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:55:16 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:26:52PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
> > > "Michael S.
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 19:55:16 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:26:52PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:38:13 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Greg Kurz writes:
>
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> > On
Greg Kurz writes:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:00:28 +0300
>> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> >
>> > > On
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:26:52PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:00:28 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin"
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:00:28 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:12:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:59:26 +0200
> > > Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:27 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:00:28 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:12:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:12:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:59:26 +0200
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:19:24 +0200
> > Greg Kurz wrote:
> >
> > > Calling assert() really makes sense when hitting a genuine
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:00:28 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:12:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:59:26 +0200
> > Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:19:24 +0200
> > > Greg Kurz
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:14:05 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Greg Kurz writes:
>
> > Calling assert() really makes sense when hitting a genuine bug, which calls
> > for a fix in QEMU. However, when something goes wrong because the guest
> > sends a malformed
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:59:26 +0200
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:19:24 +0200
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > Calling assert() really makes sense when hitting a genuine bug, which calls
> > for a fix in QEMU. However, when something goes wrong
On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 19:19:24 +0200
Greg Kurz wrote:
> Calling assert() really makes sense when hitting a genuine bug, which calls
> for a fix in QEMU. However, when something goes wrong because the guest
> sends a malformed message, it is better to write down a more meaningul
>
Greg Kurz writes:
> Calling assert() really makes sense when hitting a genuine bug, which calls
> for a fix in QEMU. However, when something goes wrong because the guest
> sends a malformed message, it is better to write down a more meaningul
> error message and exit.
>
>
Calling assert() really makes sense when hitting a genuine bug, which calls
for a fix in QEMU. However, when something goes wrong because the guest
sends a malformed message, it is better to write down a more meaningul
error message and exit.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz
---
19 matches
Mail list logo