07.02.2017 16:27, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Laszlo spotted and studied this wasteful "if". He pointed out:
>
> The original virtio_blk_free_request needed an "if" as it accesses one
> field, since 671ec3f05655 ("virtio-blk: Convert VirtIOBlockReq.elem to
> pointer", 2014-06-11); later on in f897bf751fbd
On Tue, 02/07 21:27, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Laszlo spotted and studied this wasteful "if". He pointed out:
>
> The original virtio_blk_free_request needed an "if" as it accesses one
> field, since 671ec3f05655 ("virtio-blk: Convert VirtIOBlockReq.elem to
> pointer", 2014-06-11); later on in f897bf751f
On 02/07/17 14:27, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Laszlo spotted and studied this wasteful "if". He pointed out:
>
> The original virtio_blk_free_request needed an "if" as it accesses one
> field, since 671ec3f05655 ("virtio-blk: Convert VirtIOBlockReq.elem to
> pointer", 2014-06-11); later on in f897bf751fbd
Laszlo spotted and studied this wasteful "if". He pointed out:
The original virtio_blk_free_request needed an "if" as it accesses one
field, since 671ec3f05655 ("virtio-blk: Convert VirtIOBlockReq.elem to
pointer", 2014-06-11); later on in f897bf751fbd ("virtio-blk: embed
VirtQueueElement in VirtI
