On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:51:21PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Currently zero extensions ops are implemented by a and op with a
> > constant. This is then catched in some backend, and replaced by
> > a zero extension instruction. While this w
On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Currently zero extensions ops are implemented by a and op with a
> constant. This is then catched in some backend, and replaced by
> a zero extension instruction. While this works well on RISC
> machines, this adds a useless register move on n
