On 5/6/19 4:39 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 05/05/19 22:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The 'CFI01' NOR flash was introduced in commit 29133e9a0fff, with
>> timing modelled. One year later, the CFI02 model was introduced
>> (commit 05ee37ebf630) based on the CFI01 model. As noted in the
>
>
On 05/05/19 22:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The 'CFI01' NOR flash was introduced in commit 29133e9a0fff, with
> timing modelled. One year later, the CFI02 model was introduced
> (commit 05ee37ebf630) based on the CFI01 model. As noted in the
You got those commit references backwards, I
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 10:05:58PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>The 'CFI01' NOR flash was introduced in commit 29133e9a0fff, with
>timing modelled. One year later, the CFI02 model was introduced
>(commit 05ee37ebf630) based on the CFI01 model. As noted in the
>header, "It does not support
The 'CFI01' NOR flash was introduced in commit 29133e9a0fff, with
timing modelled. One year later, the CFI02 model was introduced
(commit 05ee37ebf630) based on the CFI01 model. As noted in the
header, "It does not support timings". 12 years later, we never
had to model the device timings. Time to
